US judge to Israeli-American plaintiff: Hamas-Arab Bank link won't stand up in court
US judge dismisses Hamas financing suit against Arab Bank
Click here to add AMMAN as an alert
Disable alert for AMMAN,
Click here to add Arab Bank as an alert
Disable alert for Arab Bank,
Click here to add Avi Dichter as an alert
Disable alert for Avi Dichter,
Click here to add Bob Chlopak as an alert
Disable alert for Bob Chlopak,
Click here to add Brooklyn as an alert
Disable alert for Brooklyn,
Click here to add Canada-Israel Committee as an alert
Disable alert for Canada-Israel Committee,
Click here to add Gary Osen as an alert
Disable alert for Gary Osen,
Click here to add Gaza as an alert
Disable alert for Gaza,
Click here to add Hamas as an alert
Disable alert for Hamas,
Click here to add Jack Weinstein as an alert
Disable alert for Jack Weinstein,
Click here to add Mati Gill as an alert
Disable alert for Mati Gill,
Click here to add UN Court as an alert
Disable alert for UN Court,
Click here to add US State Department as an alert
Disable alert for US State Department
A federal judge on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit brought by a US man wounded in the Middle East who sought to hold the Arab Bank liable for providing material support to the Palestinian group Hamas.
At the time of the attack, Gill was serving as an aide to Israel’s then-public security minister, Avi Dichter, according to the complaint. Gill was wounded by sniper fire while touring Israel’s border with a delegation from the Canada-Israel Committee, the complaint said.
In court papers, Gill said an individual purporting to represent Hamas, which has governed in Gaza since 2007, claimed responsibility for the shooting on a Hamas-run website.
Gill, a dual US-Israeli citizen, sued the Amman-based Arab Bank in 2011, claiming it provided financial support to Hamas and coordinated payments to family members of group members killed in action.
He sought monetary damages under the US Anti-Terrorism Act, which allows victims of attacks by US-designated foreign terrorist organisations to seek compensation. The US State Department designated Hamas as such an organisation in 1997.
“Moral blame should only follow if the harm caused by providing bank services to terrorists is foreseeable,” Weinstein wrote, saying he found insufficient proof the Arab Bank had knowledge its actions would lead to a US citizen being harmed.
“Hamas is not the defendant; the bank is,” Weinstein wrote. “And the evidence does not prove that the bank acted with an improper state of mind or proximately caused plaintiff’s injury.”
The case, which had been set to go to trial on November 19, is one of a handful filed against banks in Brooklyn federal court by survivors of Hamas-affiliated attacks.
A lawyer for Gill, Gary Osen, said he was disappointed and intended to appeal.
“This is the first Arab Bank case where the court has evaluated the entire record, and it dismissed the case concluding that the bank was not responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries,” Bob Chlopak, a spokesperson for Arab Bank, said in a statement.
- Al Tayer bucks the US department store trend with Bloomingdale's Kuwait opening
- Gulf Islamic banks set to outperform conventional banks for second year: Moody's
- Jordan secures EU finance for socioeconomic and environmental programs
- Same-day service deliveries in GCC an untapped market: Wing CEO
- Will terror attacks damper Arabs' appetite for European holidays?
- Rachel Corrie vs. Arab Bank: hypocrisy and injustice in the US' legal system
- Israeli Court Top Judge Names Committee Members to Inquire into Killing of Arab Citizens
- Families of U.S. citizens killed or wounded in bombing attacks in Israel file $875 million lawsuit against Arab Bank
- Arab lawyers and judges meet Jordan
- Israeli Court Orders Compensation for Kahane Supporters