Airline spokesman rules out technical, human error in Russian plane crash
Deputy director general of Kogalymavia airline company, also known as Metrojet, Alexander Smirnov attends a press conference in Moscow on November 2, 2015. (AFP/Kirill Kudryavtsev)
Click here to add Alexander Smirnov as an alert
Disable alert for Alexander Smirnov,
Click here to add Andrei Averyanov as an alert
Disable alert for Andrei Averyanov,
Click here to add Boeing as an alert
Disable alert for Boeing,
Click here to add Cairo as an alert
Disable alert for Cairo,
Click here to add China Airlines as an alert
Disable alert for China Airlines,
Click here to add Kevin Humphreys as an alert
Disable alert for Kevin Humphreys,
Click here to add Kogalymavia as an alert
Disable alert for Kogalymavia,
Click here to add Middle East Airlines as an alert
Disable alert for Middle East Airlines,
Click here to add Moscow as an alert
Disable alert for Moscow,
Click here to add Oksana Golovina as an alert
Disable alert for Oksana Golovina,
Click here to add St. Petersburg as an alert
Disable alert for St. Petersburg
The Russian airline whose jet crashed in Egypt, killing all on board, said on Monday the disaster could not have been caused by a technical fault or human error.
The crash, in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula on Saturday, could only have been the result of some other "technical or physical action" which caused it to break up in the air and plummet to the ground, said Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of the airline, Kogalymavia.
He did not specify what that action might have been, saying it was up to the official investigation to determine.
"The plane was in excellent condition," Smirnov told a news conference in Moscow. "We rule out a technical fault and any mistake by the crew," he said.
He said there had been no emergency call from the pilots to services on the ground during the flight, which took off from the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh bound for the Russian city of St Petersburg.
Several aviation experts questioned whether the airline had enough information so early in the investigation, without the benefit of a complete readout from "black box" flight recorders, to say what may or may not have caused the crash.
Under international aviation rules, airlines are not directly accredited to crash investigations and are discouraged from commenting on probes while they are still active.
"What is really disturbing is the statement by the company that this airplane couldn’t possibly disintegrate: nobody is qualified to make a statement like that at this phase of investigation," said Kevin Humphreys, a former Irish regulator who founded the country's air accident investigation agency.
Kogalymavia's deputy general director for engineering, Andrei Averyanov, said damage from a 2001 incident when the plane's tail section struck the tarmac on landing had been fully repaired and could not have been a factor in the crash.
The 2001 landing at Cairo by its then operator Middle East Airlines caused "serious damage", Flight International magazine reported at the time.
Safety experts say failures from such episodes are extremely rare, but there have been two major accidents blamed on poor tail repairs carried out up to two decades earlier, including the world’s deadliest single-jetliner disaster in Japan.
In 1985, a Japan Air Lines Boeing 747 crashed after the rear of the fuselage ruptured following poor repairs after a tail strike seven years earlier. Only four of the 524 people on board survived.
In 2002, a China Airlines Boeing 747 crashed in the Taiwan Strait, killing all 225 passengers and crew. Investigators found cracks caused by faulty tail-strike repairs 22 years earlier.
Averyanov said the Russian aircraft's engines had undergone routine inspection in Moscow on Oct. 26 which found no problems and he said that in the five flights before the crash the crew had recorded no technical problems in the aircraft's log book.
Oksana Golovina, a representative of the holding company that controls Kogalymavia, told the news conference the airline had experienced no financial problems which could have influenced flight safety.
By Tim Hepher (Editing by Jason Bush and Andrew Roche)