EU nations: No Syrian chemical weapons destruction here
Preceding the collective EU decision to not host the destruction of Syrian chemical weapons on home soil, Albania publicly refused to take on the task following international momentum to encourage Tirana to host the mission (Courtesy of EU)
Click here to add Bashar Assad as an alert
Disable alert for Bashar Assad,
Click here to add Damascus as an alert
Disable alert for Damascus,
Click here to add European Union as an alert
Disable alert for European Union,
Click here to add Frans Timmermans as an alert
Disable alert for Frans Timmermans,
Click here to add Guido Westerwelle as an alert
Disable alert for Guido Westerwelle,
Click here to add Interfax as an alert
Disable alert for Interfax,
Click here to add Organization for the Prohibition for Chemical Weapons as an alert
Disable alert for Organization for the Prohi ...,
Click here to add Pieter De Crem as an alert
Disable alert for Pieter De Crem,
Click here to add Riad Haddad as an alert
Disable alert for Riad Haddad
Not a single European Union nation came forward Monday offering to host the destruction of Syria’s poison gas stockpile, with many instead calling for the arsenal to be eradicated close to Syria itself.
Belgium had been considered a strong candidate after the withdrawal of Albania, but Defense Minister Pieter De Crem said that “the movement of those weapons is a tough enough task in itself” and crossed his country out as a possible destination.
“To do that here at home – I don’t see that at first sight, and also not in the long term,” he told VRT network, highlighting a reluctance found across the 28 EU nations.
“There is no member state that has come forward in saying ‘OK, give us the stuff,’” Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans said.
After Albania refused to take on the task Friday, Belgium – as well as France – had been considered a possible candidate, if only because it has a long history of destroying the gas arsenal from World War I.
The Organization for the Prohibition for Chemical Weapons has adopted a plan to destroy Damascus’s estimated 1,300-ton arsenal, which includes mustard gas and sarin, outside Syria, but has yet to find a country willing to host the risky operation.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle also took his country out of the mix:
“When I look at the technicality, the geographical stretch, then I think that such a discussion makes no sense.”
The OPCW has not released any names of countries where the weapons could be destroyed but says it remains confident it can wipe out the entire arsenal by mid-2014. Norway has said it will send a civilian cargo ship and navy frigate to pick up the stockpile.
Timmermans said that it might make sense to turn the whole issue around.
“Instead of taking the chemical weapons out of Syria to the installations where they would be destroyed, one could perhaps take the installations to the chemical weapons instead,” he said.
Wherever it happens, the destruction of Syria’s weapons will be overseen by experts from the OPCW.
Separately, Syria’s ambassador to Russia said insufficient funding and unspecified actions by militants fighting to oust President Bashar Assad were hindering the government’s compliance with a deal to abandon chemical weapons, the Interfax news agency reported.
“The main obstacles to Syria fulfilling its commitments [are] the lack of provision of the funding necessary to fulfill this task,” Ambassador Riad Haddad was quoted as saying.
“On top of that, armed groups are creating hindrances to satisfying the agreement’s conditions.
- EU grants $16 million to U.N. chemical watchdog for Syrian arms destruction
- Russia "satisfied" with Syria's chemical weapons destruction
- NATO, Russia back destruction of Syria chemical weapons, Geneva peace talks
- China to send military ship to guard Syria chemical weapons destruction
- Germany to send 300 soldiers to help in Syria chemical arms destruction