Is the first step to stopping Daesh to end the crisis in Syria?
Click here to add Ankara as an alert
Disable alert for Ankara,
Click here to add Barack Obama as an alert
Disable alert for Barack Obama,
Click here to add Bashar Assad as an alert
Disable alert for Bashar Assad,
Click here to add Beirut as an alert
Disable alert for Beirut,
Click here to add European Union as an alert
Disable alert for European Union,
Click here to add Hizballah as an alert
Disable alert for Hizballah,
Click here to add North Atlantic Treaty Organization as an alert
Disable alert for North Atlantic Treaty Orga ...,
Click here to add Nouri al-Maliki as an alert
Disable alert for Nouri al-Maliki,
Click here to add Paris as an alert
Disable alert for Paris,
Click here to add U.N. Refugee Agency as an alert
Disable alert for U.N. Refugee Agency,
Click here to add U.N. Security Council as an alert
Disable alert for U.N. Security Council,
Click here to add United Nations as an alert
Disable alert for United Nations,
Click here to add Vladimir Putin as an alert
Disable alert for Vladimir Putin
For almost five years, a bloody war has raged in Syria. What began as a democratic uprising against Bashar Assad’s dictatorship has developed into a cat’s cradle of conflicts, partly reflecting a brutal proxy struggle among Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia for regional domination. This struggle, as the fighting in Yemen has shown, has the potential to destabilize the entire region. And now Russia, by means of its military intervention on Assad’s behalf, is seeking to enhance its status as a global power vis-à-vis the West (and the United States in particular).So the conflict in Syria is taking place on at least three levels: local, regional, and global. And, because the fighting has been permitted to fester and spread, around 250,000 people have died, according to United Nations estimates. This summer, the U.N. Refugee Agency put the number of refugees who had fled Syria at 4 million, in addition to 7.6 million internally displaced people. In the meantime, the flow of Syrian refugees to Europe has developed into one of the greatest challenges the European Union has ever faced.
The Syrian civil war has also become one of the most dangerous breeding grounds for Islamist terrorism, as ISIS attacks in Ankara, Beirut and Paris, and the bombing of a Russian passenger plane above the Sinai Peninsula, have shown. Moreover, Turkey’s downing of a Russian warplane has heightened the risk that major powers will be drawn directly into the fighting. After all, Turkey, as a NATO member, would be entitled to the alliance’s military assistance were it to be attacked. For all these reasons, the Syrian war must be brought to an end as quickly as possible. Not only is the humanitarian disaster worsening almost on a daily basis; so are the security risks emanating from the war.
Following the Nov. 13 terrorist attacks in Paris, a new opportunity to end Syria’s agony has emerged, because all the important players (except ISIS) are now willing to sit down together at the negotiating table. But, although all players have agreed to fight ISIS first and foremost, the big question remains whether they will in fact do so.
The Kurds in northern Syria and Iraq are the most effective fighters against ISIS, but their own national ambitions put them at odds with Turkey. Iran and Saudi Arabia are fighting primarily against each other for regional predominance, relying on nonstate actors. Russia is fighting for global status and against any form of regime change.
Russia thus finds itself allied with Iran in supporting Assad’s dictatorship, while Iran, in turn, is pursuing its own geopolitical interests by backing its Shiite ally in Lebanon, Hezbollah, for which the Syrian hinterland is indispensable. France is more serious than ever about fighting ISIS, while Germany and other Europeans feel obliged to assist it – and to stem the flow of refugees emanating from the region.
The U.S., meanwhile, is operating with handbrakes on. President Barack Obama primarily wants to avoid involving his country in another Middle East war before the end of his term. With the main global power remaining on the sidelines, however, the inevitable result has been a highly dangerous power vacuum, which Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to exploit.
In particular, because the U.S. refuses to lead and Europe is too weak militarily to influence developments in Syria on its own, there is a threat of a de facto European alliance with Putin’s Russia. That would be a grave error, given that any kind of cooperation with Russia wouldn’t contain or end the war in Syria: In fact, there is reason to fear the opposite: Any military cooperation with Assad – which is Putin’s aim and price tag – would drive a large majority of Sunni Muslims into the arms of radical Islamists.
Such a tendency is already visible in Iraq. The Shiite-dominated government of former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki played a decisive role in radicalizing Iraqi Sunnis and convincing them to support ISIS. It would be extremely stupid to repeat the same mistake willfully in Syria. Indeed, striking such a bargain would have nothing to do with realpolitik, because the war in Syria cannot be ended with either ISIS or Assad still in the picture.
Any Western collaboration with Russia must avoid two outcomes: the linking of Syria with Ukraine (the negotiations with Iran on limiting its nuclear program succeeded without such a linkage) and military cooperation with Assad. Instead, an attempt should be made to link a military intervention against ISIS, conducted under the auspices of the U.N. Security Council, with an agreement on a political transition process that moves from an armistice to a national unity government for Syria and the end of the Assad regime.
And there are other big challenges looming beyond Syria: Iraq’s descent into chaos, closely linked to the Syrian tragedy, threatens to turn into a new theater of conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Unless this fight for regional hegemony is contained, further proxy wars – with all the risks they entail – are inevitable.
Ultimately, the decisive battle with Islamist extremism will take place within the Sunni community. Which form of Sunni Islam will prevail – the Wahhabi version or a more modern and moderate one? This is the decisive question in the fight against ISIS and its ilk. In this context, an important factor will be how the West treats its Muslims – as welcome citizens with equal rights and obligations, or as permanent outsiders and fodder for jihadi recruiters.
By Joschka Fischer
- Europol questions ‘weak’ link between Daesh and recent attacks
- Democratic VP pick Tim Kaine wants the US to do more for Syria and the refugee crisis
- The end to fighting in Syria's Yarmouk refugee camp?
- In aftermath of Dhaka attacks, Bangladesh seeks international assistance in fighting extremism
- Obama: Russia must show it is ‘serious’ about defeating Daesh, ending Syrian conflict