Syria and Egypt 2013: small steps to solutions or developing tragedies?
Syrian civilians were evacuated from a besieged town near Damascus earlier this year in a rare truce agreement that suspended rebel-regime fighting to allow Syrians to flee to safety (File Archive/AFP)
Click here to add Al Nour as an alert
Disable alert for Al Nour,
Click here to add Bashar al Assad as an alert
Disable alert for Bashar al Assad,
Click here to add Damascus as an alert
Disable alert for Damascus,
Click here to add Islamic Salafist Al Nour Party as an alert
Disable alert for Islamic Salafist Al Nour Party,
Click here to add Mohammed el-Damati as an alert
Disable alert for Mohammed el-Damati,
Click here to add Mohammed Mursi as an alert
Disable alert for Mohammed Mursi,
Click here to add Mubarak as an alert
Disable alert for Mubarak,
Click here to add Muslim Brotherhood as an alert
Disable alert for Muslim Brotherhood,
Click here to add The Associated Press as an alert
Disable alert for The Associated Press,
Click here to add United Nations as an alert
Disable alert for United Nations
2013 has been an expectedly terrible year for several Arab nations. It has been terrible because the promises of greater freedoms and political reform turned violent and have taken a few countries down the path of anarchy and complete chaos. Syria and Egypt are two cases in point.
Syria has been hit the hardest The United Nations said that over 100,000 people have been killed in the 33 months of conflict. More recently, the pro-opposition Syrian Observatory for Human Rights concluded that at least 125,835 have been killed, a third of which are civilians..
The UN’s humanitarian agency (OCHA) says that millions of Syrians are currently living in perpetual suffering and in need of aid, and this number will reach 9.3 million by the end of next year.
OCHA’s numbers attempt to forecast the need for aid for the year 2014. However, that estimation reflects an equally ill-omened political forecast as well. There are currently 2.4 million Syrian refugees living in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt. The number will nearly double to 4.1 million by the conclusion of next year. Considering the growing political polarization between the Syrian parties involved in the conflict, and their regional and international backers, there is little hope that the conflict will end the near future.
In fact, the typical narrative of a conflict between a central government and an opposition is no longer applicable, since the opposition is itself fragmented into many parties, some with extreme religious agendas. The initial purpose of the Syrian uprising which demanded freedom, democracy and such is also of little relevance, considering the level of brutalities that have occurred. For Syrians, it is a lose-lose situation.
Syrians involved in this war understand well that a prolonged conflict could mean that the country faces the risk of complete breakdown, and that a Somalia or an Afghanistan scenario is in the cards. Few would even care to remember the original reasons of why the war started in the first place, as several generations of Syrian refugees would be doomed to live the same fate as the unending Palestinian refugee experience.
However, there is a glimmer of hope. The recently signed landmark deal between Iran and six other countries - the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany – could in fact usher in at least the mere possibility of resolving the crisis in Syria. True, the deal was related to Iran’s nuclear program, but since all of these countries are active participants in the Syrian war, with much influence over the warring parties, their consensus would be necessary for future dialogue between Damascus and the opposition to bear fruit.
A major question however will continue to surface: even if the secular Syrian opposition agrees to a future arrangement with the current Syrian regime of Bashar Al Assad, will that have any bearing on other extremist forces fighting their own cause? Even with the most optimistic assessments, the Syrian conflict is unlikely to be settled in 2014.
The same assessment is also relevant in the case of Egypt. In 2013, the conflict in Egypt took on a different dimension, although most media, Arab and international, are saturated by half-truths and/or intentional misinformation. It is almost impossible to reach a level-headed understanding of what is transpiring in the most populated Arab country.
One main reason behind the confusion is that reporting on the Jan 25 2011 revolution was overly sentimental and simplified. In some aspects, the bad guys vs. good guys scenario continues to define the Egyptian turmoil. The Egyptian media is a prime example of that. Since the well-orchestrated June 29 protest, followed by a military coup in July 3, some secular forces affiliated with the revolution lined up in support of the very forces affiliated with the deposed Mubarak regime. Both camps united in opposition of a government affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) – itself affiliated with the revolution.
It gets more convoluted still, since the Islamic Salafist Al Nour Party has no problem siding with the military, in support of its newly drafted constitution, although it was al-Nour that tirelessly lobbied for a Sharia-driven constitution under the leadership of deposed President Mohammed Mursi. It was that kind of pressure that drove many secularist parties away from the committee that attempted to draft an earlier constitution, leaving the MB isolated. Al Nour and secularist parties are now standing in the same political camp.
‘Dirty politics’ doesn’t even begin to describe what has befallen in Egypt, for the violent dimension of these political games is unknown in the modern history of the country. Nearly 20,000 Egyptians are now sentenced or facing trials for belonging or supporting the ‘wrong’ political camp. The military-backed government is now unleashing a ‘legal onslaught’, freeing those who affiliated with the Mubarak regime and imprisoning those affiliated with the MB. On Dec 21, the toppled president Mursi was referred to by Egyptian prosecutors to a third criminal trial on “charges of organizing prison breaks during the 2011 uprising, spreading chaos and abducting police officers in collaboration with foreign militants,” reported the Associated Press.
Brotherhood lawyer Mohammed el-Damati described the purpose of all of this as an attempt to defeat every single achievement of the January revolution. “They are going over Jan. 25, 2011, with an eraser,” he said. But will they succeed?
While the military enjoys a large influence over every facet of power in Egypt, the Egyptian people are no longer passive participants. Reversing the achievement of the revolution will not necessarily affect the collective mindset that gave the Egyptian people the kind of zeal that made them stand and fight for their rights. No military decrees or legal maneuvering can erase that. 2014 is likely to be a year in which the nature of the conflict in Egypt changes from that of military versus Muslim Brotherhood, into a non-elitist conflict that surpasses all of this into something else. Perhaps a struggle that will recapture the spirit of the first revolution.
By Ramzy Baroud
- Will Egypt follow Iraq's descent into chaos?
- Anarchy in Iraq main cities, severe health crisis expected in Baghdad
- Founder of Germany’s ‘Sharia police’ on trial for supporting extremism
- Qatar's outgoing Emir -- an entrepreneur for the small Gulf state
- Germany collaborates with Egypt on citrus development