US seeks international coalition to act on Syria, despite UK setback
The United States will continue to seek out an international coalition to act together on Syria, despite a vote against military action by British MPs, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Friday.
“Our approach is to continue to find an international coalition that will act together. And I think you’re seeing a number of countries state, publicly state, their position on the use of chemical weapons,” Reuters quoted Hagel as saying during a trip to the Philippines.
He said the “goal of President [Barack] Obama and our government ... whatever decision is taken, that it be an international collaboration and effort.”
He added that Washington respected the British parliament’s stance rejecting participation in any punitive strikes against the Syrian regime and that it would continue consulting with Britain.
“We are continuing to consult with the British as with all of our allies. That consultation includes ways forward together on a response to this chemical weapons attack in Syria,” Agence France-Presse quoted Hagel as saying.
“Every nation has a responsibility to make its own decisions,” Hagel said.
The defense secretary said he couldn’t speculate if there was anything Syria could do to avert possible U.S. military action.
“I have not been informed of any change in the Assad regime’s position on any issue. I deal with the reality with what we have. I don’t speculate on hypothetical situations.”
Cameron told parliament on Thursday that it had to “make a judgment” about a military strike on Syria, saying there was no “100-percent certainty” the Syrian regime used chemical weapons.
(With Reuters and AFP)
- Britain leaves Europe, Assad outlasts Cameron, and Lebanon seeks its own vote
- UK to step up role against IS, but won’t send ground troops
- Russia: UK decision shows dangers of military action
- Hezbollah: Lebanon should not join U.S. anti-terrorism coalition
- Battle of the Bulge: Obesity in the Gaza Strip on the rise