Professor Dajani said he expected criticism. “I believe a trip like this, for an organised group of Palestinian youths going to visit Auschwitz, is not only rare, but a first,” he said. “I thought there would be some complaints, then it would be forgotten.”
But the trip was explosive news to some, perhaps more so because it took place as US-brokered peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians were in danger of collapse, and emotion surrounding the decades-old conflict is high.
Controversy was also heightened by rumours – untrue – that the trip was paid for by Jewish organisations. It was paid for by the German government.
Professor Dajani said that many Palestinians think the Holocaust is used by Jews and Israelis as propaganda to justify the seizure of their lands and to create sympathy for Israel. Others, he said, think the Holocaust is exaggerated or just one massacre that occurred during the Second World War. “They said, ‘Why go to Poland? Why not teach our young people about the Nakba?’ ” the professor said.
The Nakba, or catastrophe, refers to the events of 1948 when Arabs and Israelis fought a war, the Arabs lost, the state of Israel was born, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were expelled from their lands and became a people of a diaspora, living, even today, as refugees across the Middle East.
An online version of an article about the trip published in the major Palestinian newspaper Al Quds was taken down by the publishers, reportedly because of the invective in the comments section.
One reader said that taking Palestinian students to Auschwitz was not freedom of expression, but treason. Critics of the trip also included newspaper columnists, TV analysts and fellow researchers in the West Bank.
While the Palestinian students were visiting Auschwitz, a parallel group of Jewish Israeli students from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and Tel Aviv University were taken to Bethlehem to hear Palestinians from the Dheisheh refugee camp tell their story. The responses of both groups of students – Israelis and Palestinians – will then be analysed.
A firebrand in the Fatah political movement when he was young, Professor Dajani said he is now a proponent of moderate Islam and moderate politics. He founded a group dedicated to both, called Wasatia, in 2007. His writing and conversation are filled with references to tolerance, reconciliation and dialogue. He supports two states for two peoples and thinks Jerusalem should be shared by Israelis and Palestinians.
“He is a theologian and a pragmatist, and in that regard, he is unique here. He is also extremely brave,” said Matthew Kalman, a commentator at the Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz who broke the story of the Auschwitz trip.
However, some of Professor Dajani’s detractors accused him of trying to brainwash Palestinian youth.
A university student who went on the trip but asked not to be named because of the charged atmosphere said the visit changed him. “You feel the humanity. You feel the sympathy of so many people killed in this place because of their race or religion.
“Most people said we shouldn’t go,” the student added. “It is a strange thing for a Palestinian to go to a Nazi death camp. But I would recommend the trip.” He said it did not diminish his desire for a Palestinian state.
Al Quds University issued a statement saying Professor Dajani and the students were not representatives of the university. Palestinian universities cut off all ties with Israeli counterparts some years ago to protest Israeli actions.
Many Palestinians today oppose what they call “normalisation”, which they say seeks to paper over the injustice of the Israeli military occupation by encouraging joint projects between Israelis and Palestinians as if they were both equal.
“I am against normalisation with Israel as long as they are building settlements and walls,” said Hamdi Abu Diab, a leader of a popular committee that opposes Israeli occupation. “But I do want Palestinians to know about the terrible things that happened to the Jews at Auschwitz. Because at the same time, I don’t want the Palestinians to be punished like the Jews were.”
Hani Al Masri, director of the Palestinian Centre for Policy Research and Strategic Studies, said such a trip was not a bad idea: “Iall depends who is running the show.”
In a statement last week, Professor Dajani wrote: “I will go to Ramallah, I will go to the university, I will put my photos of the visit on Facebook, and I do not regret for one second what I did. As a matter of fact, I will do it again if given the opportunity. I will not hide, I will not deny, I will not be silent. I will not remain a bystander even if the victims of suffering I show empathy for are my occupiers. And this is my final statement on this issue.” Later, he added that in this debate, there may be no such thing as a last word.
By William Booth