Booz Allen Hamilton: Towards More Effective Regulation

Published April 29th, 2007 - 09:58 GMT
Al Bawaba
Al Bawaba

A recent analysis by Booz Allen Hamilton has determined that effective regulatory management is key to creating telecom markets that thrive. The success or failure of telecom sectors often hinges on the presence of effective regulatory frameworks and practices. Empirical evidence demonstrates that effective regulation encourages growth and investment in the telecom sector, promotes technological and service innovation, and is correlated with lower prices and greater consumer choice, leading to greater service penetration.

 

Issues surrounding telecom regulation are particularly important for countries in the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Middle East and North Africa (MENA). “Most countries in the region have made real strides in gradually liberalizing their telecom markets and introducing new technologies, but as a general rule, the observed approach to policy and regulation could still improve” says Bahjat El-Darwiche, a principal with Booz Allen Communication and Technology practice, based in the firm’s Riyadh office. “This would help reduce the regulatory uncertainty that can dampen investments and inhibit telecom sector development in the region.”

 

“One case study in an emerging environment showed that mobile investments were 25 percent lower, total cost of ownership 10 percent higher, and mobile market penetration 30 percent lower than they would have been had this market adopted a more effective regulatory framework,” adds El-Darwiche. “Numerous other examples of tactical or mis-adapted regulatory management destroying market value can be found around the world.”

 

“Effective regulatory management aims to establish adequate regulatory frameworks and mature regulatory practices that drive market development and optimize value creation in the long-term,” notes El-Darwiche. He explains that effective regulatory management is characterized by a holistic and strategic approach to policy and regulatory issues, long-term regulatory planning, and clear assignment and separation of policy and regulatory responsibilities. In other words, the effectiveness of regulatory management can be evaluated based on the extent to which it is strategic rather than tactical and customized to market conditions at hand rather than copied and pasted from other markets without due adaptation.

 

Effective Telecom Regulation Development Levers

<?xml:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />

Regulatory Independence

Policies defining the independence of the Regulator from the influence of government or commercial entities

 

 

 

Government

Participation

Level

Policies and regulation governing state ownership in the telecom sector

Management

Practice

Core values governing best practice regulatory management

Licensing

Framework

Regulation related to the nature of the licensing regime enabling technologies and services (e.g. VoIP)

Competition

Regulation

Market

Access Conditions

Regulation governing new entrants’ ability to compete with the incumbent

Regulation governing accessibility to consumers and resources (e.g., interconnection, number portability, etc.)

 

 

 

 

Regulator

Regulatory

Management Capabilities

Operating and human capabilities required to define comprehensive regulatory strategies and planning

Communication

Strategy

Communication approach aiming to find a balance between the often conflicting interests of different stakeholders

 

 

Operator

Financial

Obligations

Policies governing financial obligations imposed on telecommunications operators (e.g. royalties)

<?xml:namespace prefix = w ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" />

 

“All of the key stakeholders involved in the telecom sector—government, regulators, and operators—have distinct and important roles to play, and must embrace them fully,” says El-Darwiche. In examining the roles of these three main players, nine key regulation development levers are identified that can help enhance the growth of the telecom sector in the MENA region. Ultimately, it is the end-user who, if not the target of effective regulatory management, is the player most positively impacted by it, in the form of lower prices, more advanced technologies, and greater service variety.

The Role of Government

Ensure Regulatory Independence

Government works on the macro level to advance the telecom sector, the national economy, and society as a whole. “To fulfill their legal mandate more effectively,” says Fady Elias, a Booz Allen associate, based in the firm’s Beirut office, “governments typically empower regulators to achieve structural and financial independence. To achieve this end, government does not only issue a policy decision to create an independent regulatory agency, but also empower the agency to act independently and effectively.” The MENA region has achieved sensible progress; however, regulators in the region could further advance their political and financial independence.

Non-MENA Countries

 

MENA Countries

 


Regulatory Independence Benchmarks –  MENA vs. Other Countries (2006)

Country

Regulatory Body

Setup Year

Independent Chairman

Independent Board

Independent from Ministry

Self-Financed

Algeria

ARPT

2001

X

X

ü

ü

Bahrain

TRA

2002

ü

ü

ü

ü

Egypt

NTRA        (formerly TRU)

1998

X (minister)

ü

ü

ü

Jordan

TRC

1995

ü

ü

ü

ü

Morocco

ANRT

1997

ü

ü

ü

ü

Oman

TRA

2002

X (minister)

ü

ü

Self financed, may use treasury help  if in deficit

Saudi Arabia

CITC          (formerly SCC)

2001

X (minister)

ü

ü

Self financed and government appropriation

UAE

TRA

2003

X

ü

ü

Self financed and government appropriation

Australia

ACMA        (formerly ACC)

1997

ü

ü

ü

Fees, government appropriation, operator contributions

France

ARCEP     (formerly ART

1996

ü

ü

ü

Government appropriation

Germany

Bnetza      (formerly RegTP)

1998

 

ü

ü

Fees, government appropriation, operator contributions

Singapore

IDA

1999

ü

ü

X

ü

Switzerland

ComCom

1997

ü

ü

ü

Government appropriation

UK

OFCOM    (formerly Oftel)

1984

ü

ü

ü

Fees, government appropriation, operator contributions

USA

FCC

1934

ü

ü

ü

Fees and government appropriation

 

Reduce Government Ownership of Incumbents

“On the other hand,” explains Elias, “regional governments could consider further reducing their ownership of incumbents to promote telecom sector investments.” Lower ownership does not prevent the government from guiding the sector toward a healthy development path. Although MENA countries began the liberalization of their telecommunications markets in the last decade, most have yet to reduce government ownership levels.

 

Government Ownership of Incumbent, (Selected Countries) (2006)

 

Omantel

Oman

 

Maroc Telecom