Israel edged closer to its third election within a year today as neither the embattled Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nor his main rival appeared close to forming a government two days before the deadline.
Right wing Netanyahu and former army general Benny Gantz, who leads the centrist Blue and White alliance, traded blame over the impasse ahead of Wednesday - the last opportunity to form a coalition and avoid fresh polls.
A new election would be a repeat of September's deadlocked vote, which in itself was a response to inconclusive April polls, and would further deepen the political turmoil in the Jewish state.
'We made offer after offer and got nothing. Nada,' Netanyahu said Sunday at a conference organised by a conservative Israeli newspaper. 'Blue and White did not budge a millimetre.'
The two parties have been discussing forming a unity coalition but Gantz has rejected serving under Netanyahu, pointing to his indictment on a string of corruption charges.
'The prime minister must serve as an example to the public,' Gantz said at a meeting of his faction Monday.
He called on Netanyahu to publicly drop a demand that he be immune from prosecution, saying doing so would open the door to a unity government and avoiding 'costly and unnecessary elections'.
Following the inconclusive elections in September, both Netanyahu and Gantz were given 28-day periods to try and negotiate a workable coalition in Israel's proportional political system.
Neither was able to get the support of more than half of the members of the 120-seat Knesset, or parliament.
President Reuven Rivlin then turned to parliament in the hope of avoiding an unpopular election.
But the 21-day period he granted parliament to find a suitable candidate expires at 11.59pm on Wednesday.
If nothing changes by then, new polls will be called for, most likely to be held in March.
Theoretically any member of parliament could try and gain the necessary support, but Netanyahu and Gantz remain the only realistic contenders.
A last-minute deal could still be reached with the help of a kingmaker in a political system where such battles often go down to the wire.
Avigdor Lieberman, whose secular nationalist Yisrael Beitenu party has eight seats and holds the balance of power, could decide to throw his support behind either bloc.
He has so far refused to back either, accusing Gantz of being reliant on the support of Israel's Arab minority and Netanyahu of being at the whim of ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties.
He prefers a unity government, but weeks of talks have faltered.
Most Israeli media Monday reported little movement in the negotiations, setting the stage for new elections.
Netanyahu's political problems are intertwined with his legal woes - Israel's attorney general last month indicted him for bribery, fraud and breach of trust.
He strongly denies the allegations and accuses the country's media, police and prosecution of a witch-hunt.
No date has yet been set for the beginning of the proceedings.
Under Israeli law Netanyahu, the country's longest serving prime minister, can remain in office despite an indictment.
A new poll Monday by Israel's public broadcaster Kan found that Netanyahu's Likud and Blue and White would again be deadlocked if elections were held today.
But if they do take place, Netanyahu might face yet another battle - this time over the leadership of Likud.
Gideon Saar, a rival within the party, has called for a primary vote before any new election, though no decision has been taken yet on the idea.
On Sunday, both Saar and Netanyahu spoke at a closed-door meeting of Likud's central committee attended by around 800 people.
According to sources at the meeting cited by Israeli press, Saar received a warm welcome from his supporters but shouts of 'traitor' from Netanyahu backers.
Saar later posted a video on his Facebook page of supporters chanting his name at the event.
'The attempts to delegitimize and besmirch those who seek to run (against Netanyahu) are against the Likud's democratic spirit,' he told the crowd.
'A democratic competition strengthens the movement.'
This article has been adapted from its original source.
© Associated Newspapers Ltd.